Buy the typo of your domain and catch the lost sign-ups
Buy the misspelled or wrong-ending versions of your domain and redirect them. Testimonial.to's founder paid $35,000 for the .io and says it brought in $80K in lifetime revenue.
- Effort
- 10hours
- Scale ends at 160 hours
- Time to signal
- 30days
- Scale ends at 90 days
- Channel
- Conversion
- Cases cited
- 1
Typo domain capture means buying the misspelled or wrong-ending versions of your domain that people really type, then redirecting them to your real site. The documented case is Testimonial.to, where founder Damon Chen paid $35,000 for testimonial.io after seeing visitors land there by mistake. He says that domain has brought in $80K in lifetime revenue.
How it works
Some share of people who hear your name will type it wrong. If someone else owns the wrong version, or nobody does, those visits are lost. You buy the wrong version and send those visitors to your real site.
- Find the typos people actually make. Chen did not guess. He noticed that visitors kept going to testimonial.io when they meant testimonial.to. Look at your own signals: support messages from people who could not find you, branded search queries, and the way users write your name in emails and posts.
- Buy the main offenders, not every variant. Chen registered two: the .io ending and a spelling with an extra s. A short list of real mistakes beats a long list of possible ones.
- Accept that a good variant may cost real money. The .io domain cost $35,000. Unregistered misspellings are cheap. Variants on a popular ending may already be owned and priced high.
- Redirect cleanly and tag the traffic. Use a permanent redirect to the matching path on your main domain, with a tracking parameter so you can count what arrives.
- Check the money later. In an interview about his path from engineer to indie hacker, Chen says he looked at the numbers and found the .io had earned $80K in lifetime revenue, which he judged worth the cost.
This did not need a team. Chen's story with Testimonial starts in 2020, when he was a Cisco engineer. He ran the company alone until he hired his first employee, for marketing, at $400K ARR.
What it takes
Our estimate: about 10 hours of work, and about 30 days before you can read a signal. Most of the hours go into finding which typos matter, buying or negotiating for the domains, and setting up redirects, certificates and tracking. A negotiation with an existing owner can stretch the calendar time, even if hands-on hours stay low. Traffic shows up within days, but you need about a month to see sign-ups convert to paid and to get a revenue figure you can compare with the price.
What to measure
Visits per typo domain. This tells you whether the mistake is real and how big it is. A good reading is steady weekly traffic close to what you expected. A bad reading is a trickle, which means you bought a variant nobody types.
Sign-up rate of redirected visitors. These people were already looking for you, so they should convert at least as well as your direct traffic. If they convert much worse, check for a broken redirect, a certificate warning, or traffic from bots and scanners.
Paid conversions and revenue from typo traffic. This is the kind of number Chen used to judge the buy. Track it per domain so you can tell which variant earns its renewal.
Payback period on the purchase. Divide the domain cost by monthly gross profit from typo traffic. See our payback period entry. A cheap misspelling pays back fast. An expensive one needs a long, stable stream of buyers.
When it backfires
- You buy a typo nobody makes. Without evidence like Chen's observation of real misdirected visits, you are paying for a guess.
- The price outruns the traffic. $35,000 is a lot for most small companies. It worked for Chen by his own count, but a smaller brand with fewer visitors could wait years to recover that sum.
- You overcount the gain. Many people who mistype will retry or search for you. Counting every redirected buyer as new revenue inflates the result. Chen's figure and a newsletter's figure for the same move do not even agree.
- The redirect breaks. An expired certificate or a lapsed renewal sends visitors to an error page, which is worse than no redirect at all.
- Email goes missing. People who mistype your web address may also mistype your email domain. If the typo domain has no mail routing, those messages vanish.
Run it as an experiment
We recommend treating this as a before and after test with a fixed window, since you cannot split traffic you do not yet own. Use the growth experiment guide for the write-up, and add the idea to your experiment backlog with a cost estimate.
Hypothesis. Redirecting our most common typo domain will bring in paying customers whose gross profit covers the domain cost within a payback target we set before buying.
Comparison. Record branded traffic, sign-ups and "cannot find you" support messages for 4 weeks before launch. Then compare the same metrics for 4 weeks after, plus the tagged redirect traffic.
What to log. Visits per typo domain, sign-ups, paid conversions, revenue, domain price and renewal cost, and any drop in support messages about the wrong address. Put the numbers into a growth model template to project payback.
Decision rule. Keep and renew a domain if projected gross profit covers its cost within your target. For an expensive variant, set that target before you pay, and ask the seller for traffic data first.
How strong the evidence is
The grade is a case with numbers: one company documented the tactic and published a result as a figure. Testimonial.to carries it, with Chen quoted by name saying the .io domain brought in $80K in lifetime revenue. A second figure comes from a newsletter write-up on typo domains, which says Chen was $100,527 better off after 18 months across both typo domains. The two figures do not match, and neither explains its method. Neither shows a baseline or how many buyers would have found the real site anyway, and the newsletter's 'better off' figure does not say whether it is revenue or profit. It is one company, so treat it as a strong reason to check your own typo traffic, not as proof it will pay for you.
Cases
Damon Chen saw that many people typed testimonial.io when they meant testimonial.to, so he paid $35,000 for the .io domain. He also registered a second misspelling with an extra s. He says the .io domain has brought in $80K in lifetime revenue. A newsletter puts the gain from the typo domains at $100,527 after 18 months, a figure that does not match his.
Source: Damon Chen: From Engineer to Indie Hacker Making $1,300,000 ARR, creatoreconomy.so
Questions
How do I know which typo domains to buy?
Look for evidence that people actually make the mistake, such as support messages, branded search queries and how users write your name. Chen bought testimonial.io only after noticing visitors kept landing there by mistake.
How many variants should I register?
Start with the few that people really type. Chen registered two: the .io ending and a spelling with an extra s.
Is paying thousands for a domain ever worth it?
It can be if the traffic is large and steady. Chen paid $35,000 for the .io and says it brought in $80K in lifetime revenue. Those figures are his own and come without a baseline, so estimate your own payback before buying.
Why do the two reported results differ?
Chen gives $80K in lifetime revenue for the .io domain. A newsletter says he was $100,527 better off after 18 months from the typo domains. Neither explains how it was calculated, so the gap cannot be resolved from these sources.
Sources
- Damon Chen: From Engineer to Indie Hacker Making $1,300,000 ARR, creatoreconomy.so, 2023-11-29.
- 10% of ARR from typo domains, Marketing Examples.